This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

lying_and_creativity_critique [2014/10/21 07:46] (current)
kit5039 created
Line 1: Line 1:
 +  - There was plenty of information about the topics they covered, however it was very dense. There was a lot of information jammed into each subheading. 
 +  - There weren'​t a lot of links to their information in each of the headings.  
 +  - The bibliography didn't conform to APA style. The authors weren'​t in alphabetical order. 
 +  - They could have used more subheadings as a way of splitting up the information they had, that way it wouldn'​t looks so dense. It would have better flow when actually reading it, and it wouldn'​t seem overwhelming. 
 +  - The "old pages" section seemed odd, and some of those links did not work.