This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

peer_review_two [2010/05/05 19:33]
jes created
peer_review_two [2010/05/06 15:58] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 Peer review: Peer review:
 +The wiki's content is well-organized and precise. ​ The presentation is orderly and straight forward; I also think that the glossary is a plus.  I do not really have too much to say about the project. I did read the previous comments after I looked the wiki over myself, and I think that the prior criticism well received and applied.